- Grizzlies' Jenkins talks NBA 'code' after no-call on Draymond
- League Pass
- nba
- nba draft 2024
- nba espn
- nba finals
- nba games
- NBA Games - All NBA matchups
- nba games today
- nba highlights
- nba live
- nba news
- NBA Players & Team Rosters
- nba playoffs
- nba rookies
- nba schedule
- nba scores
- nba standings
- nba star
- NBA Team Standings & Stats
- nba today
- nba youngboy
- nbaa
- The official site of the NBA for the latest NBA Scores, Stats ...
- Warriors move to 2-0 in NBA Cup, roll past Grizzlies, 123-118
- who won the mike tyson fight
Mike Tyson and Roy Jones: When Is a Fight Not a Fight? | The New Yorker

Mike Tyson and Roy Jones: When Is a Fight Not a Fight? | The New Yorker

The article “Mike Tyson and Roy Jones: When Is a Fight Not a Fight?” from The New Yorker examines the complexities surrounding the much-anticipated exhibition match between Mike Tyson and Roy Jones Jr. on November 28, 2020. The fight, which took place as part of a pay-per-view spectacle, raised several important questions about the nature of boxing, the expectations of modern audiences, and what it means for two boxing legends to step back into the ring after years of retirement.
Key Points Discussed in the Article:
- The Nature of an Exhibition Fight:
- Tyson vs. Jones was promoted as an exhibition fight rather than a competitive one. This distinction meant that the match wasn’t officially sanctioned by major boxing organizations and that there wouldn’t be a winner or a loser in the traditional sense. However, the promotional material and the public’s perception still treated it like a real fight, creating confusion around what exactly was at stake.
- The World Boxing Association (WBA) and other sanctioning bodies typically require a fight to follow specific rules and for a clear winner to be declared. This was not the case here, but it didn’t stop people from expecting a thrilling spectacle.
- Tyson’s Return to the Ring:
- Mike Tyson, the former heavyweight champion who dominated boxing in the late 1980s, made his return to the ring at age 54. The match was positioned as a comeback for Tyson, who had been away from the sport for over 15 years.
- Tyson had been in the spotlight recently for his podcast and public appearances, often hinting at a possible return to the ring. Fans were curious whether Tyson, despite his age and long retirement, could still perform at a high level.
- Roy Jones Jr.’s Role:
- Roy Jones Jr., a former champion in multiple weight divisions, also returned to the ring for this event. Jones, like Tyson, had not fought competitively in several years but had continued to stay involved in boxing commentary and training.
- While Jones was considered by many to be the more technically sound and agile fighter, Tyson’s raw power was seen as the potentially decisive factor in the fight. Jones had a significant age advantage (he was 51 years old at the time), but Tyson’s years of inactivity raised questions about how he would perform in the ring.
- The Commercialization of Boxing:
- The Tyson-Jones fight was an event driven by nostalgia, appealing to fans of boxing’s past and the broader public interested in seeing two legendary fighters square off. It represented the commercialization of the sport, where the spectacle itself—rather than the competitive nature of the fight—was the primary selling point.
- The fight was also part of a broader trend of retired fighters returning to the ring for money-making events, which raises ethical questions about the nature of professional sports, aging athletes, and the pressures to continue performing despite obvious risks to health and safety.
- What Constitutes a “Real” Fight?:
- One of the core questions explored in the article is: When is a fight not really a fight? In the case of Tyson vs. Jones, the absence of a knockout and the fact that no official winner was declared raised concerns about the integrity of the event. Both men were in their 50s and not in peak fighting shape, making the event feel more like a spectacle than a true competitive fight.
- Boxing purists might argue that this kind of match cheapens the sport, as it blurs the lines between what is a legitimate, sanctioned fight and what is simply entertainment. The outcome felt secondary to the experience of seeing two legends in the ring again, which led to a broader conversation about the place of spectacle in sports.
- Rules and Safety Concerns:
- The fight took place under a set of rules that differed from professional boxing. The fight was scheduled for eight rounds, rather than the traditional twelve for championship bouts, and the use of headgear was banned to prevent cuts. There were also no knockouts allowed, which led to further debate about how safe or authentic the match truly was.
- With both fighters being in their 50s, health and safety were major concerns. The fight could have easily resulted in a serious injury, which brings up the broader issue of whether it’s appropriate for aging athletes to continue competing at a high level, even in an exhibition capacity.
- The Aftermath:
- After the fight, the official result was a split draw (according to WBC-assigned judges), though the general consensus was that Tyson had the upper hand in the fight, landing more significant punches. However, since it was an exhibition, there was no official winner declared.
- The outcome of the fight sparked mixed reactions. Some felt it was a fun, nostalgic event that allowed fans to relive the glory days of Tyson and Jones, while others criticized it for being a cash grab that took advantage of the fighters’ legacies. The reality was that the event had less to do with the quality of boxing and more to do with the appeal of seeing two famous names back in the ring.
What This Means for Boxing:
- Tyson vs. Jones raised significant questions about the future of celebrity boxing, where fighters from different eras or with limited recent experience compete for the spectacle rather than competitive merit. The event exemplified the growing trend of exhibition matches—which aren’t necessarily about high-level competition but about entertainment value.
- This trend raises questions about sports ethics, athlete welfare, and the commercialization of boxing and combat sports. How much does a fight need to be a “real” competition to be considered legitimate? Can a fight be more about the story than the athleticism, and is that acceptable?
Conclusion:
In the end, Mike Tyson vs. Roy Jones Jr. wasn’t so much about deciding who the better fighter was, but about the nostalgic appeal of two legends stepping into the ring once again. The fight, though not a traditional contest by any means, highlighted the tension between sports as entertainment and sports as competition.
The article from The New Yorker explores how the event blurred these lines, with the “fight” itself serving as more of a performance than a legitimate contest, and what that means for the future of professional boxing and sports in general. It underscores the challenges of balancing legacy, safety, and commercialization in the modern sports world.