
The Paul vs Tyson fight might be big, but Serrano vs Taylor is way more significant

The Jake Paul vs. Mike Tyson fight might garner headlines and bring eyes to the ring due to the huge celebrity appeal and spectacle it represents, but when it comes to true boxing significance, the rivalry between Katie Taylor and Amanda Serrano is on an entirely different level. While Paul and Tyson represent a clash of personalities and past fame, Taylor vs. Serrano represents the pinnacle of women’s boxing—a fierce competition between two of the best pound-for-pound fighters in the world. Here’s why Taylor vs. Serrano is far more significant than the much-hyped Paul vs. Tyson matchup:
1. Legacy and Skill Over Hype
The Paul vs. Tyson fight is based largely on curiosity and entertainment value. Jake Paul, a social media star-turned boxer, has made waves in the boxing world despite his limited experience. Mike Tyson, one of the most iconic figures in the history of the sport, is far removed from his prime and is now well past his competitive peak. The Paul vs. Tyson bout, even if it draws big numbers, will ultimately be more about spectacle than true boxing excellence.
In contrast, Katie Taylor and Amanda Serrano are world-class boxers whose skills are on display every time they step into the ring. Taylor is widely regarded as one of the best female boxers of all time, having held the undisputed lightweight title and remained undefeated for years. Serrano, on the other hand, is the first woman in history to win seven world titles across multiple weight classes, and she is known for her explosive power and technical prowess. Their rivalry is based on skills, achievements, and the quest for greatness—something that cannot be said about the Paul vs. Tyson event.
2. Impact on Women’s Boxing
The Taylor vs. Serrano rivalry is important not only for the sport but also for the future of women’s boxing. This fight represents the culmination of years of hard work and progress to give women the recognition they deserve in a sport that has traditionally been male-dominated. Both fighters have become symbols of excellence in women’s boxing, inspiring a new generation of female fighters and fans alike. Their historic first fight, which took place in 2022, was a milestone, and their rematch promises to elevate that legacy even further.
Meanwhile, the Paul vs. Tyson fight does little to advance the cause of boxing itself. While Paul has attracted attention to the sport through his antics and marketing, it’s unlikely that his fight with Tyson will have a lasting impact on the future of boxing as a whole, especially at the elite level.
3. The Stakes are Higher in Taylor vs. Serrano
The stakes in Taylor vs. Serrano 2 are about titles, legacies, and respect. Taylor, who remains the undisputed lightweight champion, is looking to maintain her place at the top, while Serrano, who lost a razor-thin decision to Taylor in their first fight, is looking to redeem herself and secure a legacy-defining win. A victory for Serrano would cement her as one of the greatest female boxers of all time, while another win for Taylor would further solidify her status as the pound-for-pound queen.
On the other hand, the Paul vs. Tyson fight is driven more by public interest than by competition. While there will be money to be made, both fighters are unlikely to be concerned with creating a lasting legacy in the sport. Tyson’s prime is long gone, and Paul is still a novice, making the fight feel more like a cash grab than an essential match for boxing’s future.
4. The Level of Competition
In the world of elite boxing, the level of competition in the Paul vs. Tyson fight simply doesn’t compare to that in Taylor vs. Serrano. Mike Tyson is a legendary figure, but he hasn’t been actively competing at a high level for years. His exhibition fight against Roy Jones Jr. in 2020 proved that Tyson, while still a dangerous fighter, is far removed from his prime. Jake Paul, meanwhile, has made a name for himself by fighting washed-up or untested opponents, with limited experience in real competition. His fight against Tommy Fury was his first true test, and the result was a mixed one.
Taylor vs. Serrano, however, is about two elite athletes who are in their primes and have fought the best in their divisions. Both women have faced and beaten the toughest competition available, with Taylor having fought and defeated champions like Chantal Cameron, Jessica McCaskill, and Delphine Persoon, while Serrano has made history with her record-breaking reigns across multiple weight classes. Their fights are about testing each other’s skills at the highest level, and that’s what makes it meaningful to the sport.
5. The Real Drama is in the Ring, Not the Promotion
With the Paul vs. Tyson fight, there’s an overwhelming sense that it’s more about the promotion than the fight itself. The build-up is filled with theatrics, social media drama, and trash talk—factors that are important for drawing attention and creating hype, but ultimately distract from the true essence of boxing. The focus is on the spectacle and the personalities involved rather than the actual fight.
On the contrary, Taylor vs. Serrano has real drama, fueled by their previous close encounter and the deeply felt emotions that both fighters bring into the ring. The first fight between Taylor and Serrano was a war that went the full distance and could have gone either way. The rematch is anticipated not because of the promotion, but because of the genuine competition between two fighters who want nothing more than to prove they are the best. There’s a lot more at stake here—respect, legacy, and championships—which makes the story far more compelling than any staged drama in the Paul-Tyson bout.
6. The Impact on Boxing’s Legacy
The significance of Taylor vs. Serrano goes beyond just one fight. Both women are pioneers, pushing the boundaries of what women can achieve in boxing and inspiring future generations. Taylor’s dominance in the lightweight division and Serrano’s trailblazing in multiple weight classes are reshaping how women’s boxing is viewed worldwide. Their rivalry has already contributed to the growing popularity of women’s boxing, and a third fight—should it happen—would likely be a historic event for the sport.
The Paul vs. Tyson fight, while attention-grabbing, will likely be a short-term boost for the sport’s visibility, but it will not leave a lasting imprint on the future of boxing. It’s hard to see how Jake Paul’s career will evolve into something that challenges the legacy of the sport’s greatest figures. His focus on entertainment rather than skill makes his impact feel more superficial than what Taylor and Serrano are doing for the sport.
Conclusion: A Battle of True Boxing Prowess vs. Entertainment
While Paul vs. Tyson may have more immediate buzz due to the fame of its participants, Taylor vs. Serrano is the fight that truly matters in the world of boxing. It’s a battle between two world-class fighters, with a legacy on the line and a sport to elevate. Katie Taylor and Amanda Serrano are shaping the future of women’s boxing, proving that the sport is about much more than just physicality—it’s about skill, heart, and determination.
In the end, while the Paul vs. Tyson spectacle might be fun to watch, Taylor vs. Serrano is where the real drama unfolds—and it’s the fight that defines boxing’s future, particularly for women in the sport.